Hegseth Offers Military Controllers Amid Shutdown

Sean Duffy says staffing shortages could ground holiday travel as safety concerns mount.

military controllers
[Credit: Airman 1st Class Shelimar Rivera Rosado / U.S. Air Force]
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced that the Department of War offered military air traffic controllers to help ease the growing strain on the nation's aviation system caused by the government shutdown.
  • Duffy acknowledged that military controllers may not be certified for civilian airspace but indicated he would consider using them if feasible.
  • The FAA experienced 81 "staffing triggers" nationwide, including significant controller no-shows (e.g., 18 of 22 at Atlanta), contributing to over 6,000 delayed flights over the weekend.
  • Duffy warned that the situation is expected to worsen, potentially reducing air travel to a "trickle" by the two weeks before Thanksgiving.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said Sunday that the Department of War has offered to lend military controllers to help ease the growing strain on the nation’s aviation system as the government shutdown continues. 

“Pete Hegseth, Secretary of War, texted me yesterday and said, ‘I might have some air traffic controllers. If you could use them, I’m going to offer them to you,’” Duffy told CNN’s Jake Tapper during an interview. 

Duffy said the offer may not be feasible since military controllers are not certified in civilian airspace, but added, “If I can, I’m going to use them.”

According to Duffy, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) experienced 81 “staffing triggers” nationwide on Saturday, up from 61 on Oct. 31. Eighteen of 22 controllers at Atlanta’s air traffic facility did not show up, he said, contributing to more than 6,000 delayed flights over the weekend. 

“It’s only going to get worse,” Duffy said, warning that by the two weeks before Thanksgiving, “you’re going to see air travel be reduced to a trickle.”

Matt Ryan

Matt is AVweb's lead editor. His eyes have been turned to the sky for as long as he can remember. Now a fixed-wing pilot, instructor and aviation writer, Matt also leads and teaches a high school aviation program in the Dallas area. Beyond his lifelong obsession with aviation, Matt loves to travel and has lived in Greece, Czechia and Germany for studies and for work.

Continue discussion - Visit the forum

Replies: 3

  1. Avatar for mjkobb mjkobb says:

    There might be a few cases where this would help, but controllers have to be individually certified for whatever facility they’re working in. They have to understand the airspace, the procedures, interactions with neighboring airspace, and the various LOAs that govern traffic moving between different control entities. That certification can take many months.

    So, it seems to me that Hegseth’s offer is largely posturing.

  2. There are instances where flight data positions could be supplemented and staffed by non-FPL (full performance level) controllers. These individuals aren’t “keying the mike and issuing control instructions.”

    I see no operational problem with that.

  3. FAA controllers called them “air traffic advisors”.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE